ProPac Inc v. 5,219,224.20 dollars in US Currency et al, No. 2:2020cv03792 - Document 87 (D.S.C. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: The request that the Court vacate is prior rulings in this matter is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/14/21.(ltap, ) Modified on 5/14/2021 to edit for document type (Opinion)(sshe, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ProPac Inc v. 5,219,224.20 dollars in US Currency et al Doc. 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ProPac, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) $5,219,224.20 U.S. Dollars Deposited to ) the Account of Medical Biowaste Solutions ) Inc., In Rem, Medical Biowaste Solutions, ) Inc., and Atlantic Group USA, Inc., ) In Personam, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-3792-RMG ORDER AND OPINION This matter comes before the Court on a joint “request” of the parties to vacate all prior orders previously issued in this case (Dkt. No. 85), including the Court’s grant of a preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 42). The parties have informed the Court that the mediated settlement in this matter has been consummated and a Rule 41 request for dismissal will be filed. (Dkt. No. 85 at 2). While the Court is pleased that the parties have been able to resolve their differences and are prepared to dismiss this action, the vacating of the orders of a federal court is not a bargaining chip to be negotiated in the settlement of a case by the parties. The “request” that the Court vacate is prior rulings in this matter is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Richard Mark Gergel Richard Mark Gergel United States District Judge May 14, 2021 Charleston, South Carolina -1Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
