Scott v. Pearson et al, No. 0:2012cv01538 - Document 171 (D.S.C. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Appointing Attorney Steven Edward Buckingham for James Darnell Scott. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/21/16. (alew, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Scott v. Pearson et al Doc. 171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) Civil Action No.: 0:12-1538-BHH ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) Albert Pearson, Responsible Authority OPINION AND ORDER ) over South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections Special Investigation Unit; ) Jannita Gaston, South Carolina Dept. ) Of Correction State Classification; ) William Byars, South Carolina Dept. ) Of Corrections Director; Warden ) Anthony Padula; Associate Warden ) Margaret Bell; Associate Warden ) John Brooks; Major James Dean; and ) Ms. Reames, Institution Classification ) Chairperson, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) James Darnell Scott, Plaintiff James Darnell Scott ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action under 42.U.S.C. § 1983 on June 11, 2012. After a successful appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Citcuit, the undersigned adopted the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and denied Defendants' motion for summary judgment in light of the Incumaa1 decision. There is no right to appointed counsel in Section 1983 cases. Harwick v. Ault, 517 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1973). The court is granted the power to exercise its discretion and appoint counsel for an indigent in a civil action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Smith v. Blackledge, 451 F.2d 1201 (4th Cir. 1971). However, the appointment "should be allowed only in 1 Incumaa v. Stirling, 791 F.3d 517 (4th Cir. 2015). Dockets.Justia.com exceptional cases." Cook v. Bounds, 518 F.2d 779, 780 (4th Cir. 1975). Here, Plaintiff has presented evidence that exceptional circumstances exist in this case. Accordingly, the Court requested that Attorney Steven Buckingham represent Plaintiff in this action. Attorney Buckingham has agreed to undertake representation of Plaintiff. The Court hereby appoints Steven Buckingham to represent Plaintiff from this point to the conclusion of the trial. Should the result of trial be unfavorable for Plaintiff, appointed counsel will be deemed to have completed his duties, and Plaintiff will be required to file his own notice of appeal, if applicable. Attorney Buckingham shall file a Notice of Appearance in this matter and, thereafter, is given sixty (60) days to withdraw or file any motions or responses to motions which he deems appropriate. Counsel for both parties are to confer on a mutually agreeable joint scheduling order with a jury selection date after March 31, 2017, and submit that proposed order to Judge Hendricks' ECF e-mail box. If counsel cannot agree on a scheduling order, separate proposed orders can be submitted. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Bruce Howe Hendricks United States District Judge September 21, 2016 Greenville, South Carolina -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
