Spino et al v. Rushmore Loan et al, No. 1:2020cv00123 - Document 44 (D.R.I. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 6/9/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Spino et al v. Rushmore Loan et al Doc. 44 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 429 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 430 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 431 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 432 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 433 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 434 Case 1:20-cv-00123-JJM-LDA Document 44 Filed 06/09/22 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 435 CONCLUSION IV. The Court need not consider any of the remaining arguments. 2 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. ECF No. 34. John J. McConnell, Jr. Chief Judge United States District Court June 9, 2022 The Spinos begin their objection by arguing that the fact that Defendants filed an answer to the Amended Complaint converts its Motion to Dismiss into a Motion for Summary Judgment. This argument defies not only the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and hundreds of years oflegal precedent, but also logic. 2 7
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
