Neal-Cappas v. Sartorius Stedim Northamerica Inc. et al, No. 3:2014cv01166 - Document 14 (D.P.R. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Jay A. Garcia-Gregory on 10/28/2014. (MAC) Modified on 10/29/2014 to edit event title (cm).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Neal-Cappas v. Sartorius Stedim Northamerica Inc. et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FRANK NEAL CAPPAS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO. 14-1166 (JAG) SARTORIUS STEDIM NORTHAMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, D.J. Before the Court are two motions to dismiss filed on August 5, 2014, by co-defendants Chase Doors Holding, Inc. and Sartorius Stedim North America, Inc. (Docket Nos. 12 and 13). Over two months have passed and, yet, Plaintiff Frank Neal Cappa has failed to oppose either motion. Therefore, and because we find that the result would not injure equity, the motions are hereby GRANTED. See RodriguezSalgado v. Somoza-Colombani, 937 F.Supp.2d 206, 210-211 (D.P.R. 2013) ("[L]itigants should take note that failure to oppose a motion in the District of Puerto Rico authorizes the presiding district judge to summarily grant the unopposed motion, at least when the result does not clearly offend equity."). This case shall be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com Civ. No. 14-1166 2 In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 28th day of October, 2014. S/ Jay A. Garcia-Gregory JAY A. GARCIA-GREGORY United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
