MCINTOSH v. LOCKHHED MARTIN, No. 3:2021cv00169 - Document 34 (W.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: OPINION - Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, as the nonmoving party, and drawing all reasonable inferences and resolving all doubts in Plaintiff's favor, Lockheed Martin's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 27 ) will be G RANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: The Motion for Summary Judgment as to Failure to Accommodate is GRANTED; The Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Hostile Work Environment claim is GRANTED; The Motion for Summary Judgment as to the clai m of Constructive Discharge is GRANTED; The Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Disability Discrimination claim is DENIED; and The Motion for Summary Judgment as to the claim of Retaliation is DENIED. The Court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to Plaintiff's disability discrimination and retaliation claims. An appropriate Order will be entered, and as more fully stated in said Opinion. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 8/9/2023. (dlg)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.