VINOSKY v. CONSIGLIO et al, No. 3:2020cv00134 - Document 143 (W.D. Pa. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Blair County (ECF No. 104 ) is GRANTED, without prejudice; 2) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Fry , Rosenberry, and Township of Logan (ECF No. 108 ) is GRANTED, with prejudice; 3) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Leo Berg and Allegheny Township (ECF No. 110 ) is DENIED; 4) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Consiglio (ECF No. [11 6]) is GRANTED, without prejudice; 5) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Estep, Fochler, and Hollidaysburg Borough (ECF No. 118 ) is DENIED; 6) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Letcher and Hoover (ECF No. 120 ) is DENIED; and, 7) Pl aintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint on or before October 29, 2021 as to his claims against Defendants Consiglio and Blair County as provided in the accompanying Opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 9/29/2021. (dlg)