MILLER v. ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 3:2007cv00260 - Document 40 (W.D. Pa. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court hereby enforces the Subpoena served upon Perspective Consulting, Inc. on or about 2/25/2008. However, the Court also recommends that the partie s file an appropriate proposed protective order in accordance with the Court's Opinion regarding privacy, and limitations to this litigation, as detailed above. The Court did not find any justifiable evidence that Plaintiff was conducting this discovery for the malevolent purpose of harming Perspective's reputation. Furthermore, given the entire context of the case, the Court orders that as to Document Request 1, half of the costs of production should be shifted to Miller. As to Doc ument Requests 8, 9 and 10, all costs for the desired production shall be shifted to Miller; however, prior to such production and the consequent shifting of costs, the parties must agree upon a cost-efficient method of production, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/17/2009. (dlg)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.