Hawks v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. et al, No. 2:2021cv00612 - Document 76 (W.D. Pa. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re 71 MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Rhonda Hawks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 09/11/23. (jer)

Download PDF
Hawks v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. et al Doc. 76 Case 2:21-cv-00612-LPL Document 76 Filed 09/11/23 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RHONDA HAWKS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC., and THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND AFFILIATES LONGTERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00612 Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ECF No. 71 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER On August 29, 2022, this Court entered its Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this form: Defendant’s termination of Plaintiff’s long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits was vacated and Defendant was directed to retroactively reinstate Plaintiff’s long-term benefits and calculate those benefits in accordance with the terms of her disability insurance policy. ECF No. 52. Twice thereafter the parties communicated to the Court their mutual agreement on calculations of past-due benefits. At no time did either party communicate that Defendant, despite the Court’s Order, had not reinstated Plaintiff’s benefits. Following the Court’s August 16, 2023 Memorandum Opinion and Order, ECF No. 70, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Alter Judgment owing to the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00612-LPL Document 76 Filed 09/11/23 Page 2 of 3 Court’s express assumption that benefits had been reinstated. Defendant appeared to concur as to its continued non-payment of LTD benefits and the adjustment of calculations for extension of past-due benefits from September 28, 2022 to August 23, 2023 (a date beyond the entry of judgment), but with a lack of clarity as to dates and amounts, and calculation errors by the parties. See ECF Nos. 71, 73 and 75. On review of the pleadings, it is: HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter Judgment, ECF No. 71, is hereby GRANTED as follows: The Court’s prior judgment of August 16, 2023 at ECF No. 70 is modified nunc pro tunc, by replacing the first paragraph on page 7 with the following: The parties are in agreement that past-due benefits accrued at the rate of $2,647.16 per month from January 7, 2020 to the date hereof, a period of 43.32258 months, yielding a principal arrearage of $114,681.80. The Court notes that the average arrearage of the past-due payments as of the date hereof is approximately one-half of the 43.32258-month period, or 21.66129 months. Accordingly, the Court will award 21.66129 months of simple interest at the rate of 6% per year, or .5% per month, on the principal sum of $114,681.80, yielding prejudgment interest of $114,681.80 × 21.66129 × .005 = $12,420.78 and a total past-due benefits and prejudgment interest award of $114,681.80 + $12,420.78 = $127,102.58. And by replacing the last paragraph, on page 22, with the following: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded the sum of $171,268.53, comprising past benefits through the date hereof in the amount of $114,681.80; prejudgment interest in the amount of $12,420.78; attorney’s fees in the amount of $43,337.50; and costs in the amount of $828.45. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall pay to Plaintiff LTD benefits in the amount of $2,647.16 monthly from and after the date hereof, in accordance with this Court’s Order of August 29, 2022. 2 Case 2:21-cv-00612-LPL Document 76 Filed 09/11/23 Page 3 of 3 All other aspects of the Court’s judgment remain. Dated: September 11, 2023 By the Court: ____ Lisa Pupo Lenihan United States Magistrate Judge 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.