D.C. et al v. PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al, No. 2:2019cv00012 - Document 42 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER granting Defendant Pittsburgh Public School's 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; dismissing certain other claims, sua sponte, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; granting in part, denying in par t, and mooting in part Defendant Pittsburgh Public School's 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting Defendant Marion Parker's 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and granting Defendant Mark McClinchie& #039;s 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The only claims that remain are the claim against Defendant Pittsburgh Public Schools in Count VII and the claim against Defendant Nicholas Sible in Count IX. Plaintiffs shall have until 12/23/19 to amend their Complaint. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 12/3/19. (jms)

Download PDF
D.C. et al v. PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al Doc. 42 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.