WRIGHT et al v. SCHULTZ, No. 2:2018cv00938 - Document 48 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of May 2019, after careful consideration of the Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 1-3), Stonecliffs Amended Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 29), Andersens Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (ECF Nos. 34 and 35) , Stonecliffs Response and Brief in Opposition (ECF Nos. 39 and 41), Andersens Reply Brief (ECF No. 42), the arguments of counsel, and for the foregoing reasons, Andersens Motion to Dismiss is granted. Stonecliffs Amended Third-Party Complaint against Andersen is dismissed.Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 5/28/2019. (bjl)

Download PDF
WRIGHT et al v. SCHULTZ Doc. 48 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.