STEWART v. GEICO INSURANCE et al, No. 2:2018cv00791 - Document 36 (W.D. Pa. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the claim for Bad Faith asserted by Dr. Stewart, in each instance and in the totality of circumstances, fails to produce sufficient evidence for any jury to conclude bad faith by clear and convincing evidence. As such, GEICOs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted. Dr. Stewarts claim for Bad Faith in Count II of his complaint is dismissed. A separate order will follow. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 2/19/2020. (bjl)

Download PDF
STEWART v. GEICO INSURANCE et al Doc. 36 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.