JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al, No. 2:2017cv01135 - Document 233 (W.D. Pa. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re 171 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MARK CAMPBELL, WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, D. RUFF, THOMAS TRKULJA, C. STEELE, L. TYSON, VALERIE BEARER, JENNIFER MONZA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 6/30/2020. (mqe)

Download PDF

JACKSON v. SCHOUPPE et al Doc. 233 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTEN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD EUGENE JACKSON, II Plaintif, V. WILLIAM SHOUPPE, et al., Deendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:l7-cv-1135 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 For the reasons that ollow, the Court will grant Deendants' Motion or Summry Judgment (ECF No. 171) and enter judgment in their avor and against Plainti. I. Relevant Procedural History Plaintif Richard E. Jackson, II was incrcerated in the Beaver County Jail ("BCJ") on July 28, 2015 as a pretrial detainee awaiting prosecution in state court. Approximately three months later, on October 24, 2015, the BCJ transerred him rom its general population into its Special Needs Unit ("SNU"). From that point orward, Plaintif remained housed in one of the jail's more restrictive areas, such as the SNU or the Restrictive Housing Unit ("RHU"), until he was transerred to a state correctional institution around late January or early February 2017. Plaintif is proceeding pro se in this civil action. In his Amended Complaint (ECF No. 35), he named as deendants the ollowing BCJ oficers and oficials: Warden William 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(l), the parties have voluntarily consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct proceedings in this case. Thereore, Footnote continued on the next page ... Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.