BUXTON v. RIVERS CASINO, No. 2:2015cv01653 - Document 227 (W.D. Pa. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION re 226 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/25/20. (mh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BUXTON v. RIVERS CASINO Doc. 227 Case 2:15-cv-01653-JFC-CRE Document 227 Filed 11/25/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDY BUXTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. RIVERS CASINO, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1653 MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, plaintiff Andy Buxton (“Buxton”) asserted that Rivers Casino engaged in a civil conspiracy with other defendants to deny his rights as protected by the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Buxton’s theory was that Rivers Casino provided falsified documents to agents of the Commonwealth Attorney General’s Office that were thereafter used in criminal proceedings against him. The case was referred to a United States magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D. On January 15, 2020, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 205), recommending that summary judgment be granted in favor of Rivers Casino and against Buxton. On March 4, 2020, this court issued an opinion and order adopting the R&R and entered judgment in favor of Rivers Casino and against Buxton (ECF Nos. 210, 211). On March 13, 2020, Buxton filed a notice of appeal. Ten days later, on March 23, 2020, Buxton filed the pending pro se motion for reconsideration of this court’s March 4, 2020 decision (ECF No. 214).1 Because Buxton was pursuing an appeal, this court did not act on the motion for reconsideration. 1 Buxton signed the motion on March 17, 2020. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:15-cv-01653-JFC-CRE Document 227 Filed 11/25/20 Page 2 of 2 On September 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued an opinion which affirmed this court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Rivers Casino (ECF No. 224-1). The mandate was returned to this court on November 10, 2020 (ECF No. 224). Buxton’s motion for reconsideration is now ripe for disposition by this court. A response from Rivers Casino is not necessary. The court of appeals affirmed this court’s March 4, 2020, decision in favor of Rivers Casino. This court is bound by the appellate court’s decision and, in any event, Buxton did not articulate any valid grounds to reverse this court’s decision. Buxton’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s March 4, 2020 decision (ECF No. 214) will, therefore, be DENIED. An appropriate order will be entered. Dated: November 25, 2020 BY THE COURT: /s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti Senior United States District Court Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
