RHOADES v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, No. 2:2009cv00261 - Document 50 (W.D. Pa. 2009)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : After careful consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Attachment A), it is ordered that said Motion is denied. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 11/17/09. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Letter, # 2 Exhibit B: Letter) (jlh )

Download PDF

Nov. 10 2009 02:04AM FAX NO. :7245582183 FROM :BEATRIZ Beatriz Rboades 10691-yotr ~e5"'''o 1!k,~U,PA 1 \1QQ Lower Du,t.l.r "1 co..... beatti1;rb.oadeS@hotmal (412).877-3435 ..Ll& November 1o~ 2009 ByFaJt: (412)208-7357 . r>onetta W. AmbroSe, Chief Judge Court's chanlbm United states District, Court . Western Disttict ofPennsylvama Beatriz Rhoades ,v. yWCA of Greater Pittsburgh. RE: us 0 C Western District ofPA No" 09-0261 R~~deration Court Order dated October 14, 2009 Honotable Chief Judge Donetta W. Ambrose: Plaintiff Beatriz Rhoades respectfully is asking to yo~ Hono;aJ:le Court. for a Reconsideration Court Order dated October 14, 2009 regardmg Plamtiff's motion to compel. Plaintiff would like to have a conference call on Wednesday, ,November 11, 2009 at 9:00 AM to discuss this matter if the Chief Judge Donetta W. Ambrose approved it. Second Set Document reguest 2 Provide Ceridian report called: Employees Witt No Lateness by Department from 0110112002 to date. Court Order dated 10/1412009 states: ','Defendants objects that this request is vague and that the information sought is irrelevant. I agree with defendant that this request is vague in that it is difficult to discern what Plaintiff is asking for with this request. A~rdingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel will be denied as to request 2". This is a report already set up in Ceridiansystem; it is easy to run it Plaintiff has been accused of being late. This report showed exempt and non exempt employees with no lateness. This report is important for Plaintiff to support her claims. Second Set: Document Request 19. 20 Court Order dated 1011412009 states; Considering that the YWCA of Greater Pittsburgh bas existed for around 140 years and Plaintiff does not specify a time frame in which she is seeking information relating to prior charges of discrimination and P2 retaJiatio~ this request is unduly vague and burdensome. Plaintiff's motion to compel is denied as to these requests. PlaintifFs Second Set of Interrogatori~ Request for Production of Documents and Admissions to defendant YWCA II. Instructions Q. states: Unless stated otherwise, the time period covered by this Discovery request is January 172002 to date. (Please see page # 5). First Set: Document Request 2; Second S£t: Document Rsg,uest 4 Court Order dated 10/1412009 states: request 2 (First Set) and 4 (Second Set) ask Defendant to produce all employee personnel files for employees hired andlor terminated by Barbara manning, Valerie Wheatley, Lillian Young, and Dena Davis from January 1,2002 to present. There request are unduly broad and burdensome. Relevant information can be obtained through First Set of Interrogatories 8,9,10, 16,17,18,34,35; First Set of Document request 3,4,5,13,14,15,16,18,22,23,27 and 31; and Second Set of Document request 13. . Request 2 (First Set) and 4 (Second Set) are a valuable infonnation to see a pattern of discri.mi.natlon on each one of the individual defendant Valerie Wheatley, Barbara Manning, Lillian Young and Dena Davis. A pattern of discrimination that it is not show on First Set of Interrogatories 8,9,10, 16,17,18,34;35; First Set of Document request 3,4,5,13t14~15116~18~22,23,27 and 31; and Second Set of Document request 13. First Set: Document Request 6.7,8,9. and 10; Second Set: Document Request S. 6. 7.8,14 Request 6,1,8,9,10 (First Set) and request 5,6,7,8,14 (Second Set) request copy of emails . The emails will provide important fuformati.on to support plaintiff claims. Wherefore, PlaintiffrespectfulJ.y requests that the Court order Defendant YWCA ofGreater Pittsburgh to provide the responses to Second Set: Document request 2, 4, 5, 6, 7,8,14,19, and 20; First Set: Document Request 2t 6,1,8,9, and 10. RespectfuUy submitted, eatti% lJkOi~ Pro laintiff .. oades@hotmail.com 1069 Ivory Lane Lower BtlITC14 PA (412)-877-3435 Byemai1 cc Bethany Salvatore, Esquire Bethany.Salvatore@bipc.com Jaime S, Tuite, Esquire Jaime.Tuite@bipc.com Lisa M. Passarello Lisa.Passarello@bipc.com Nov. 10 2009 02:04AM FAX NO. :7245682183 FROM :Blr.ATRIZ Beatriz Rhoades bea1rizrhoa.des@hottnail.com , 1069 Ivory Lane Lower Burtell. PA 15068 (412) 877~3435 Fax To: Donetta W. Ambrose, ChiefJudge Fax: (412)-208-7357 From: Beatriz Rhoades Pages: Cover+2 pages Date: November 10,2009 Re: Reconsideration Court Order dated October 14, 2009 Pi

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.