PINKNEY v. MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA et al, No. 1:2019cv00167 - Document 70 (W.D. Pa. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. The motion to dismiss 53 filed on behalf of Defendant Paula DiGiacomo is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as are Counts VII, X and XI of the Amended Complaint against Defendant DiGiacomo, the Court having declined to exe rcise supplemental jurisdiction of such state law claims; The motion to dismiss 55 filed on behalf of Defendants Meadville, Pennsylvania, Michael J. Tautin and Jared Frum is GRANTED as to Counts II-VI of the Amended Complaint, and all federal law c laims asserted under these Counts are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The claims asserted against Defendants Meadville, Pennsylvania, Tautin and Frum under Counts VIII and XI of the Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the ex tent that Count XII (erroneously designated as a second Count X) of the Amended Complaint asserts a claim against Meadville, Pennsylvania based upon the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, it is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent Count XII asserts a claim under state law, it is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; The motion to dismiss 57 filed on behalf of Defendants Meadville Tribune, Community Newspaper Holding, Inc. and Keith Gushard is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as are Counts VIII, IX and XI of the Amended Complaint against Defendants Meadville Tribune, Community Newspaper Holding, Inc. and Gushard, the Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of such state law claims. The moti on to dismiss 59 filed on behalf of Defendants Allegheny College and William Merchbaker is GRANTED as to Counts I, V, and VI of the Amended Complaint, and all federal law claims asserted under these Counts are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The claims asserted against Defendants Allegheny College and Merchbaker under Counts VIII and XI of the Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 4/3/2020. (dm)

Download PDF
PINKNEY v. MEADVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA et al Doc. 70 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 30 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 2 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 3 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 4 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 5 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 6 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 7 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 8 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 9 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 10 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 11 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 12 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 13 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 14 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 15 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 16 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 17 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 18 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 19 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 20 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 21 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 22 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 23 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 24 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 25 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 26 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 27 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 28 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 29 of 30 Case 1:19-cv-00167-RAL Document 70 Filed 04/03/20 Page 30 of 30

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.