STRICKLAND v. HAINES CITY POLICE DEPT et al, No. 1:2017cv00311 - Document 64 (W.D. Pa. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Officer Adams 55 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to strike 55 filed by Defendant Adams is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismi ss filed by Haines City 53 is denied as to the lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. The motion to transfer based on improper venue is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted as Plaintiff has failed tostate a Monell claim against Haines City. Plaintiff will be allowed to amend this claim following discovery. An Initial Case Management Conference will be scheduled by separate Order. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 09/25/19. (esa)

Download PDF
STRICKLAND v. HAINES CITY POLICE DEPT et al Doc. 64 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.