THOMAS v. USA, No. 1:2012cv00325 - Document 2 (W.D. Pa. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by RONALD WESLEY THOMAS, ORDER re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by RONALD WESLEY THOMAS DENYING Motion to Vacate (2255) and denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 8/5/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Order) (cag)

Download PDF
THOMAS v. USA Doc. 2 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD WESLEY THOMAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) iJ~ Civil Action No. 12-mErie Criminal Action No. 1:08-34 Senior District Judge Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2013, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner, Ronald Wesley Thomas' pro se "Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody" [ECF No. 83, as amended ECF No. 89], is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that a certificate of appealability SHOULD NOT ISSUE with respect to the Court's Order denying Petitioner, Ronald Wesley Thomas' pro se "Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody" [ECF No. 83, as amended ECF No. 89] for reasons set forth in the Opinion accompanying this Order. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 22.2 (stating that "[i]f an order denying a petition under ... § 2255 is accompanied by an opinion ... it is sufficient if the order denying the certificate [of appealability] references the opinion ...."). 1 Dockets.Justia.com The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. ~'Or~'\/4 Maunce B. Cohill ,('l Senior United States District Court Judge Western District of Pennsylvania cc: Ronald Wesley Thomas 18906-039 Hazelton U.S. Penitentiary Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 2000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.