Spicer v. Ebbert, No. 4:2017cv02324 - Document 11 (M.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ODERED that the Clerk is directed to consolidate Spicer v. Bradley 4:18-CV-2088 into Spicer v. Ebbert 4:18-CV-2324; Clerk directed to close 4:18-CV-2088; Clerk directed to serve a copy of the consolidated petition as well as this Memorandum Opinion and Order on the Respondent and the US Attorney. (see order for further/complete details and deadlines). Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/13/18. (lg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Spicer v. Ebbert Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEONTE SPICER, : : Petitioner, : : v. : No. 4:17-CV-2324 : WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, : (Judge Brann) : Respondent. : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEONTE SPICER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BRADLEY, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : No. 4:18-CV-2088 (Judge Brann) ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of November 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to CONSOLIDATE Spicer v. Bradley, No. 4:18-CV-2088 into Spicer v. Ebbert, No. 4:17-CV-2324. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case of Spicer v. Bradley, No. 4:18-CV-2088. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the consolidated -1- Dockets.Justia.com petition, as well as this Memorandum Opinion and Order by first class mail on the Respondent and the United States Attorney. 4. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall file a supplemental response addressing the allegations in the consolidated petition. 5. .Petitioner may, if he so desires, file a reply to the supplemental response within fourteen (14) days of its filing. BY THE COURT: s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
