WILLIAMS v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al, No. 5:2017cv04910 - Document 15 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 6, IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 1, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CASE IS CLOSED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 8/3/18. 8/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ BILL WILLIAMS, : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CITY OF ALLENTOWN; : KEITH MORRIS; ED PAWLOWSKI; : GLEN DORNEY; GAIL STRUSS; and : FIVE JOHN & FIVE JANE DOES, : Defendants. : _______________________________________ No. 5:17-cv-04910 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED. 2. The Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice.1 3. The case is CLOSED. 4. Plaintiff may, within twenty days of the date of this Order, file an amended complaint consistent with the Opinion. If he timely files an amended complaint, the case will be reopened. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr. JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 1 The USERRA retaliation count is dismissed with prejudice, but all other counts are dismissed without prejudice. 1 080218 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.