WEISER et al v. ELIZABETHTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al, No. 5:2017cv00625 - Document 26 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 9) IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CROSSCLAIM (DOC. NO. 10) IS DENIED AS MOOT; AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSSCLAIM (DOC. NO. 19) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/27/18. 2/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
WEISER et al v. ELIZABETHTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LIZA WEISER and SCOTT WEISER, as administrators and personal representatives of the ESTATE OF DAVID WEISER and in their individual capacities, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-625 Plaintiffs, v. ELIZABETHTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, MICHELE BALLIET, MONICA STEWARD, GEORGE LONGRIDGE, NATHAN FRANK, MICHELLE HECKMAN, MARY ROUSH, and JOHN/JANE DOE # 1-10 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES/OFFICIALS, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim, and Motion to Dismiss Amended Crossclaim, as well as the opposition thereto and all replies, and after oral argument being held, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is DENIED; 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim (Docket No. 10) is DENIED as moot; 3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Crossclaim (Docket No. 19) is DENIED; and Dockets.Justia.com 4. Defendants shall file an answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.