STURZENACKER v. CMC RESTORATION, INC. et al, No. 5:2017cv00113 - Document 14 (E.D. Pa. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF CMC AND KELLEY TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF, ECF NO. 6 , IS GRANTED; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET THE REPLY MEMORANDUM ATTACHED TO THE MOTION, ECF NO. 6 , AS HAVING BEEN FILED ON APRIL 5, 2017; THE MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 4 , IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. COUNTS II AND IV AGAINST CMC AND KELLEY, ONLY, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; B. DEFENDANT KELLEY IS TERMINATED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS A PARTY IN THIS ACTION; C. SRURZENACKER MAY FI LE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURTS OPINION AND ORDER; ON OR BEFORE JULY 14, 2017, THE PARTIES2 SHALL FILE BRIEFS DISCUSSING WHETHER OR NOT THIS COURT SHOULD EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THE APPLIC ABILITY OF 28 U.S.C. § 1367(C)(2); THE DEADLINE FOR STURZENACKER TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS STAYED UNTIL TWENTY DAYS AFTER THIS COURT ISSUES A DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT IT WILL EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 6/27/17. 6/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP, E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
STURZENACKER v. CMC RESTORATION, INC. et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ GLORIA STURZENACKER , Plaintiff, : : : v. : : CMC RESTORATION, INC.; : CHRISTOPHER & BRUMMETT, INC; : DAVID KELLEY, : Defendants. : __________________________________________ No. 5:17-CV-00113-JFL ORDER NOW, this 27th day of June, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion of CMC and Kelley to file a reply brief, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket the Reply Memorandum attached to the motion, ECF No. 6, as having been filed on April 5, 2017; 1 3. The Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: A. Counts II and IV against CMC and Kelley, only, are DISMISSED without prejudice; B. Defendant Kelley is TERMINATED, without prejudice, as a party in this action; C. Srurzenacker may file an amended complaint in accordance with this Court’s opinion and order; 1 This Court considered the Reply brief when deciding the Motion to Dismiss. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 4. On or before July 14, 2017, the parties 2 SHALL file briefs discussing whether or not this Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction and specifically addressing the applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2); 5. The deadline for Sturzenacker to file an amended complaint is stayed until twenty days after this Court issues a decision on whether or not it will exercise supplemental jurisdiction. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 2 To the extent that Sturzenacker may file an amended complaint reasserting claims against Kelley, counsel are advised that the brief may contain arguments regarding the dismissed claims against Kelley. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.