GRAHAM v. HENDRIX-ISA, LLC et al, No. 5:2016cv03676 - Document 61 (E.D. Pa. 2017)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 33, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 6/13/17. 6/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
GRAHAM v. HENDRIX-ISA, LLC et al Doc. 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ REBEKAH GRAHAM, Plaintiff v. HENDRIX-ISA, LLC; HENDRIX GENETICS, Defendants __________________________________________ : : : : : : : : : No. 5:16-cv-03676 ORDER And now, this 13th day of June, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 33, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) (b) Defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims against Hendrix Genetics is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Hendrix Genetics as a party to this case. (c) Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Hendrix Genetics LLC. (d) 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Graham’s claims of sexbased discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act is GRANTED. In all other respects, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, The Minimum Wage Act of 1968, and the Wage Payment and Collection Law, and her claim for restitution under Pennsylvania common law, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1(b). BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr.___________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.