RODENBAUGH v. SANTIAGO et al, No. 5:2016cv02158 - Document 45 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT BOANDL'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 42) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, BOANDL, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, RODENBAUGH; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 7/6/17. 7/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
RODENBAUGH v. SANTIAGO et al Doc. 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAPHNE RODENBAUGH, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE SANTIAGO, JASON ADDUDDELL, TRACY BONDALL, and ALEX THOMAS, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2158 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, after considering the renewed motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Tracy Boandl 1 (hereinafter referred to as “Boandl”) (Doc. No. 42); and the response thereto filed by the plaintiff, Daphne Rodenbaugh (hereinafter referred to as “Rodenbaugh”) (Doc. No. 43); and for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Boandl’s renewed motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 42) is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, Boandl, and against the plaintiff, Rodenbaugh; and 3. The clerk of the court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J. 1 The plaintiff incorrectly spelled the defendant Tracy Boandl’s last name in the caption of the complaint. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
