PERSONCARE OF READING, INC. v. LENGEL et al, No. 5:2016cv01965 - Document 16 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 10) IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 6) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. NO. 2) WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/17/17. 3/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
PERSONCARE OF READING, INC. v. LENGEL et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PERSONACARE OF READING, INC., d/b/a KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHABILITATION - WYOMISSING, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 16-1965 v. KATHRYN M. LENGEL and THERESA A. QUITINSKY, and as co-Executrixes of the Estate of MARY KATHRYN QUITINSKY, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2017, upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, Defendants’ Motion to Strike Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 6) and Plaintiff’s response thereto, as well as Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) and Plaintiff’s opposition thereto, and after oral argument being heard, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) is DENIED; 2. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 6) is DENIED; and 3. Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 2) within twenty (20) days. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
