WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al, No. 5:2016cv01089 - Document 100 (E.D. Pa. 2019)
Court Description: ORDERED THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 2/12/19. 2/13/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINITFFS AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al Doc. 100 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI Plaintiffs - pro se CIVIL ACTION N0.16-1089 v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, et al. Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 121h day of February 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second amended complaint for failure to prosecute, [ECF 89], to which no response has been filed by Plaintiff Jason Swiderski, it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. BY THE COURT: Isl Nitza I Quinones Alejandro NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
