ADAMS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al, No. 5:2016cv00907 - Document 67 (E.D. Pa. 2017)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 35) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/27/17. 12/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ADAMS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK ADAMS and CHRISTIE A. ADAMS, Ind. & as H/W, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0907 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and PHELAN, HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES LLP, formerly known as PHELAN, HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 35), and all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
