FULTZ v. RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, No. 5:2015cv00319 - Document 24 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ALSO DENIED; AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR A DETERMINATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 5/27/16. 6/1/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FULTZ v. RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAULA J. FULTZ, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0319 RR DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ crossmotions for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is DENIED. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is also DENIED. 3. Notwithstanding the denial of both motions, this matter is REMANDED to the plan administrator for a determination as described in the accompanying memorandum opinion. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
