MELNICK v. TEMPLE BETH EL, No. 5:2014cv03207 - Document 6 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO FURTHER PLEADINGS SHALL BE DOCKETED OR FILING FEES ACCEPTED FROM PLAINTIFF IN THIS MATTER WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE UNDERSIGNED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/28/15. 1/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )

Download PDF

MELNICK v. TEMPLE BETH EL Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SCOTT JEFFREY MELNICK, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3207 TEMPLE BETH EL, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2015, upon a review of the complaint in this matter, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk shall mark the case closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further pleadings shall be docketed or filing fees accepted from Plaintiff in this matter without prior approval of the undersigned. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.