AHMED v. HIGHWAY FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., No. 5:2013cv03250 - Document 40 (E.D. Pa. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT AFTER REVIEW OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT AND ALL EXHIBITS, ETC., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 11/18/14. 11/19/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF

AHMED v. HIGHWAY FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIKANDER AHMED, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3250 Plaintiff, v. HIGHWAY FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2014, after review of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29) and Memorandum in support and all exhibits, as well as Plaintiff’s response and all other documents provided by Plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.