NAGY et al v. ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al, No. 5:2013cv01588 - Document 33 (E.D. Pa. 2014)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LUKE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED BECAUSE THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/3/2014. 4/3/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH NAGY et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1588 v. ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2014, upon consideration of Defendant St. Luke s Hospital s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs Response to St. Luke s University Hospital or if Indeed Incorrectly Pled St. Luke Warren Hospital s Memorandum of Law and Motions and Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim with Joinder of Causes and Parties Against Manor Care of Easton Pa LLC (Doc. No. 12), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that: ï · Defendant St. Luke s Hospital s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED because the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Therefore, the case is dismissed as to all Defendants. ï · The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 10
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
