HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARDENAS, No. 5:2012cv02804 - Document 35 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER THAT MOVANTS' MOTIONS TO INTERVENE OR JOIN ARE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS GRANTED; THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT; THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/21/13. 3/21/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARDENAS Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. RUDOLFO CARDENAS, Defendant. NO. 12-2804 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 21st day of March 2013, after review of Movants motions to intervene or join in this action pursuant to Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 24 or 19 (the “Motions to Intervene or Join”) (ECF 8-10), Plaintiff’s Response to those motions (ECF 11), Movants’ and Plaintiff’s arguments at a hearing held on January 17, 2013, their supplemental letter briefs submitted at the Court’s request, and Plaintiff’s motion for entry of a default judgment (ECF 24), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Movants’ Motions to Intervene or Join are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for entry of a default judgment is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, that Plaintiff is relieved of its obligation to defend or indemnify Defendant in the lawsuit Brian D. Zern, et al. v. Smucker Company, Civil Action No. 10-15805, currently pending in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County; and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 12\12-2804 hartford v. rodolfo\12cv2804.ORDER re Joinder and Default J.docx Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.