HARRIS v. STEADMAN, No. 5:2012cv00993 - Document 88 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORT IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLANTIFF'S AMENDED COMPANY WITHIN 14 DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/11/16. 2/12/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ___________________________________ FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS, : Plaintiff : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-993 : CRAIG W. STEADMAN : Defendant : ___________________________________ : ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of February 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. No. 59] and Defendant’s response in opposition thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within 14 days. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ______________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
