SMITH v. HCSC-BLOOD CENTER, INC. et al, No. 5:2009cv00220 - Document 105 (E.D. Pa. 2010)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED, AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 10/18/10. 10/19/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SMITH v. HCSC-BLOOD CENTER, INC. et al Doc. 105 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : SARAH SMITH : Plaintiff : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-220 : HCSC-BLOOD CENTER, INC. doing : business as MILLER-KEYSTONE : BLOOD CENTER and MILLER-KEYSTONE : BLOOD CENTER : Defendants : __________________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Plaintiff s Subpoenas to Defense Experts Dr. Perez and Dr. Steiner (Dkt. No. 95) filed September 7, 2010; upon consideration of Plaintiff s Brief Contra Defendants Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Plaintiff s Subpoenas to Defense Experts Dr. Perez and Dr. Steiner (Dkt. No. 99) filed September 15, 2010; upon consideration of Defendants Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Plaintiff s Subpoenas to Defense Experts Dr. Perez and Dr. Steiner (Dkt. No. 103) filed September 22, 2010; and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that defendants motion to quash is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants motion for protective order is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry S. Perkin HENRY S. PERKIN, United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
