R.S. and R.S. v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT, No. 2:2022cv03478 - Document 30 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED. THE HEARING OFFICERS DECISION IS AFFIRMED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AGAINST R.S. AND R.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF J.S., A MINOR. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/6/23. 3/7/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
R.S. and R.S. v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT Doc. 30 Case 2:22-cv-03478-TJS Document 30 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA R.S. and R.S., Individually and on Behalf of J.S., a minor v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT, : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-3478 ORDER NOW, this 6th day of March, 2023, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15), the Defendant Lower Merion School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 14), and the parties’ respective responses and replies, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED; 2. The defendant’s motion is GRANTED; 3. The hearing officer’s decision is AFFIRMED; and 4. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of defendant Lower Merion School District and against R.S. and R.S., individually and on behalf of J.S., a minor. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
