FUHRER et al v. THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 2:2021cv05040 - Document 14 (E.D. Pa. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF KATRINA FUHRERS MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B) 10 , IT ORDERED THAT, FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE ORDER GRANTING DEFEN DANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 9 IS VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ON OR BEFORE APRIL 7, 2022, MS. FUHRER MAY FILE A RESPONSE TO THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANYS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 8 . SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 3/31/22. 3/31/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)

Download PDF

FUHRER et al v. THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATRINA FUHRER, Case No. 2:21-cv-05040-JDW Plaintiff v. THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant ORDER AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Katrina Fuhrer’s Motion For Relief From A Final Judgment Under Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 60(b) (ECF No. 10), it ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion is GRANTED. The Order Granting Defendant’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings (ECF No. 9) is VACATED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that on or before April 7, 2022, Ms. Fuhrer may file a response to The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings (ECF No. 8). BY THE COURT: /s/ Joshua D. Wolson JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.