McGLOTTEN v. OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al, No. 2:2021cv03998 - Document 47 (E.D. Pa. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT 3 AND ITS IDENTICAL STATE LAW CLAIM AND DENIED AS TO COUNTS 1 AND 2 AND THEIR IDENTICAL STATE LAW CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 2/22/23. 2/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McGLOTTEN v. OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al Doc. 47 Case 2:21-cv-03998-MMB Document 47 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TYRALL McGLOTTEN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-cv-03998-MMB v. OMNIMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2023, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 25), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF 26) and Supplemental Briefing (ECF 44), Defendants’ Reply (ECF 27) and Supplemental Briefing (ECF 45), and oral argument heard by the Court on December 8, 2022, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Decision the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion (ECF 25). It is ORDERED: 1. Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Count 3 and its identical state law claim. 2. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED as to Counts 1 and 2 and their identical state law claims. BY THE COURT: /s/ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
