BONDARUK v. PNC BANK, No. 2:2020cv05979 - Document 56 (E.D. Pa. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT PNC BANK AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF VICTOR BONDARUK; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/9/22. 9/9/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BONDARUK v. PNC BANK Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VICTOR BONDARUK Plaintiff v. PNC BANK Defendant : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-5979 ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of SEPTEMBER 2022, upon consideration of Defendant PNC Bank’s motion for summary judgment, [ECF 45], Plaintiff Victor Bondaruk’s response in opposition thereto, [ECF 49, 50], and Defendant’s reply, [ECF 53, 54], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Accordingly, JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant PNC BAnk and against Plaintiff Victor Bondaruk. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
