JONES-EILAND v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al, No. 2:2020cv05458 - Document 14 (E.D. Pa. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 10 ) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST THE NEVADA DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 8 ) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST THE U NIVERSAL HEALTH DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. WITHIN 30 DAYS PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST ONLY THE UNIVERSAL HEALTH DEFENDANTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/30/21. 9/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )

Download PDF
JONES-EILAND v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TYRELL JONES-EILAND, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-5458 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2021, upon consideration of the following motions, neither of which Plaintiff has responded to, and for the reasons set forth in my accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants, Christopher Loftus, James Zolknowski, Sajit Pullarkat, and Janet Wright’s (collectively, the “Nevada Defendants”) “Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss” (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against the Nevada Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Defendants, Universal Health Services, Inc. and Marc D. Miller’s (collectively, the “Universal Health Defendants”) “Motion to Dismiss” (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against the Universal Health Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint against only the Universal Health Defendants in an attempt to cure, if possible, the deficiencies outlined in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. Dockets.Justia.com BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.