OKULSKI v. CARVANA, LLC et al, No. 2:2020cv01328 - Document 58 (E.D. Pa. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S 8/24/20 PRDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 45 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 6/2/21. 6/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
OKULSKI v. CARVANA, LLC et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW OKULSKI, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. CARVANA, LLC, PAUL BREAUX, AND KATELYN GREGORY, Defendants. NO. 20-1328 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s August 24, 2020 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 45 & 52), and Defendants’ response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 51), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to his Fraud (Count I) and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (Count VI) claims. These claims are reinstated. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED with respect to his Professions and Occupations Act (Count II) claim. This claim is not reinstated. BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
