HANDY v. DELAWARE RIVER SURGICAL SUITES, LLC et al, No. 2:2019cv01028 - Document 251 (E.D. Pa. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT THE SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 245 ) IS AFFIRMED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED. DEFENDANT BCOS'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ) IS DENIED. DEFENDANT BCOS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 1 ) BY 6/2/22. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/19/22. 5/20/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
HANDY v. DELAWARE RIVER SURGICAL SUITES, LLC et al Doc. 251 Case 2:19-cv-01028-JHS Document 251 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT HANDY, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. No. 2:19-cv-1028 DELAWARE RIVER SURGICAL SUITES, LLC d/b/a BUCKS COUNTY SURGICAL SUITES, et al. Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2022, upon consideration of Defendant BCOS’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiff Dr. Robert Handy’s Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), BCOS’s Reply to Dr. Handy’s Response (Doc. No. 16), BCOS’s Brief Regarding Plaintiff’s Status as a Shareholder (Doc. No. 73), BCOS’s Response to Dr. Handy’s Brief Regarding his Standing (Doc. No. 93), Dr. Handy’s Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. No. 227), BCOS’s Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. No. 228), BCOS’s Opposition to Dr. Handy’s Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. No. 231), Dr. Handy’s Opposition to BCOS’s Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. No. 232), the parties’ Replies to the Oppositions (Doc. Nos. 238 and 239), the Report and Recommendation of Special Master James J. Rohn, Esquire (Doc. No. 245), BCOS’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 246), Dr. Handy’s Response in Opposition to BCOS’s Objections (Doc. No. 247), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-01028-JHS Document 251 Filed 05/19/22 Page 2 of 2 1. The Special Master’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 245) is affirmed, approved, and adopted. 2. Defendant BCOS’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED. 3. Defendant BCOS shall file an answer to the Complaint (Doc. No. 1) by June 2, 2022. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky __________________________ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.