CAMPBELL v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY et al, No. 2:2019cv00798 - Document 68 (E.D. Pa. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT ON PLAINTIFF JOSEPH CAMPBELL'S CLAIM FOR BENEFITS PURSUANT TO ERISA SEC 502(A)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. SEC 1132(A)(1)(B), JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $432, 026 PLUS INTEREST, ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/2/22. 9/2/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CAMPBELL v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY et al Doc. 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-798 v. ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant. JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 2nd day of September 2022, in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is ORDERED that on Plaintiff Joseph Campbell’s claim for benefits pursuant to ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Royal Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan in the amount of $432,026 plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky __________________________ JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
