BURKE v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES et al, No. 2:2018cv02068 - Document 34 (E.D. Pa. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON IS DISMISSED FROM THE ACTION. DEFENDANT DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED/ PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO STRIKE A CLAUSE WITHIN PARAGRAPH 59 OF DEFENDANTS' "STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS" (DOC. NO. 25 -3) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/30/20. 6/30/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BURKE v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES et al Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY BURKE, Plaintiff, v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIES, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 18-cv-2068 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25), the response and reply thereto (ECF Nos. 31, 32), and for the reasons set forth in my accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Upon the agreement of the parties, Defendant Johnson & Johnson is DISMISSED from the action. 2. Defendant DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s request to strike a clause within paragraph 59 of Defendants’ “Statement of Undisputed Material Facts” (ECF No. 25-3) is GRANTED. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
