NYBECK v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al, No. 2:2017cv04428 - Document 374 (E.D. Pa. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT A.O. SMITH CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DIC. NO. 296 ) IS GRANTED AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF A.O. SMITH CORPORATION ON ALL CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION AS CLOSED AS TO DEFENDANT A.O. SMITH CORPORATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/14/21. 5/14/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
NYBECK v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al Doc. 374 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : RICHARD NYBECK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : A.O. SMITH CORP., et al., : : Defendants. : __________________________________________: CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4428 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2021, upon consideration of Defendant A.O. Smith Corporation’s “Motion for Summary Judgment” (ECF No. 296), Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in opposition (ECF No. 315), and Defendant’s Reply (ECF No. 318), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED such that summary judgment is entered in favor of A.O. Smith Corporation on all claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this action as CLOSED as to Defendant A.O. Smith Corporation. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg Hon. Mitchell S. Goldberg Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
