ARGENTINA v. GILLETTE et al, No. 2:2017cv02908 - Document 18 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS IN HIS COMPLAINT EXCEPT COUNT II. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/30/2018. 1/30/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICOLA ARGENTINA, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. BARBARA GILLETTE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendants. NO. 17-2908 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion (ECF No. 16), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART with respect to all of Plaintiff’s claims in his Complaint (ECF No. 1) except Count II (42 U.S.C. § 1982). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Count II of the Complaint. BY THE COURT: /s/Wendy Beetlestone, J. _______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
