IRVING v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 2:2017cv01124 - Document 23 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATIONS OF BAD FAITH FROM THE COMPLAINT, IS DENIED. DEFENDANT HAS TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/29/2018. 1/30/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN IRVING, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1124 v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 12), Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations of Bad Faith from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 14), Defendant’s Reply (Doc. No. 15), and in accordance with the Court’s Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations of Bad Faith from the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 5) (Count II) is DENIED; 2. Defendant has twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order in which to file an Answer to the Amended Complaint. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
