HORN v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al, No. 2:2017cv00238 - Document 75 (E.D. Pa. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 1/23/2019. 1/24/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MELISSA K. HORN a/k/a MELISSA LESTER Plaintiff v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-238 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of April 2019, upon consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Securian Financial Network, Inc., Affinion Benefit Group, LLC, and Doug Smith (“Defendants”), [ECF 61], the response in opposition filed by Plaintiff Melissa K. Horn (“Plaintiff”), [ECF 65], and Defendants’ reply, [ECF 68], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all of Plaintiff’s claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro NITZA I. QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
