CREDICO v. ADAMO et al, No. 2:2017cv00195 - Document 30 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 17) IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE (DOC. NO. 21) IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/12/18. 3/12/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CREDICO v. ADAMO et al Doc. 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JUSTIN CREDICO, CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-195 Plaintiff, v. OIG FRANK ADAMO, UNKNOWN PHILA FOOD SERVICE STAFF, and FDC OFFICER JAMESON, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of all pending motions, and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Amended Complaint and for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17) is GRANTED; 2. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File (Docket No. 21) is DENIED; and 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this matter. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
