JORDAN v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al, No. 2:2016cv05561 - Document 55 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FOR REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THIS DATE THE MOTION TO EXCLUDE (DOC. 42) IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/1/18. 8/1/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
JORDAN v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al Doc. 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBIN JORDAN Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION N0.16-5561 v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., et al. Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 181 day of August 2018, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to exclude the opinions and testimony of Michael Torchia, Esq. pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, [ECF 42], Plaintiffs opposition thereto, [ECF 43], Defendants' supplemental memorandum, [ECF 48], and Plaintiffs sur-rebuttal, [ECF 50], it is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion of this date, the motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is precluded from offering any opinions and testimony of Michael Torchia, Esquire, at trial or at any other stage of this litigation. 1 BY THE COURT: /s/ Nitza I Quinones Alejandro NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO Judge, United States District Court In the proposed order filed with Defendants' underlying motion, Defendants request that in the event Mr. Torchia is permitted to offer expert testimony that Defendants be given additional time to produce an expert report in response to that of Mr. Torchia. In light of this Court's exclusion of Mr. Torchia's testimony, Defendants' request in this regard is denied. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
