LEE-OWENS v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, No. 2:2016cv04648 - Document 74 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 44 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED ON COUNT 1 OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTED ON COUNT III OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/7/2018. 6/7/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LEE-OWENS v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA Doc. 74 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHERYL LEE-OWENS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4648 v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of June 2018, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44); Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 50); Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition (Doc. No. 57); and Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 69), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued on this day, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Summary judgment is DENIED on Count I of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 34). 2. Summary judgment is GRANTED on Count III of the First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 34). BY THE COURT: / s / J o el H . S l o ms k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
