SIMPSON v. GARMON et al, No. 2:2016cv01810 - Document 26 (E.D. Pa. 2018)
Court Description: OPINION/ORDER THAT SIMPSON'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ECF NO. 20, IS ADOPTED IN PART AS STATED IN THE OPINION; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED; THIS CASE IS CLOSED, AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 4/5/18. 4/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
SIMPSON v. GARMON et al Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ MICHAEL SIMPSON, Petitioner, : : : v. : : MARK GARMON; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY : OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, and THE : PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, : Respondents. : __________________________________________ No. 2:16-cv-01810 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Simpson’s objections, ECF No. 22, to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, is ADOPTED in part as stated in the Opinion; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; 4. This case is CLOSED; and 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joseph F. Leeson, Jr._________ JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. United States District Judge 1 040418 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
